Dorsal approach in laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy: A case series.

RATIONALE: The utility of the dorsal approach has been reported for laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy. PATIENT CONCERNS: The aim of the present study is to show the usefulness of the dorsal approach for laparoscopic extended left-hemi-hepatectomy while ensuring safe identification of hepatic veins and dissection of the dorsal tumor margin. DIAGNOSES: Tumors requiring extended left hemi-hepatectomy. INTERVENTIONS: After mobilization of the lateral sector and division of the Arantius plate, parenchyma above the Arantius plate is removed to expose the root of the middle hepatic vein and left hepatic vein. Each of these veins can be isolated separately either intra- or extra-hepatically. After removing the parenchyma on the cranial side of the left Glissonean pedicle continuous with the exposed hepatic veins, the left Glissonean pedicle is isolated using the Glissonean pedicle transection method. After division of the left hepatic vein and Glissonean pedicle, segment 4 (in which the main part of the tumor is commonly located) is dissected from the anterior plane of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe by the dorsal approach, along with the hepatic hilum. Following dissection of the dorsal side of the tumor, and division of parenchyma from the anterior edge of the liver, the anterior Glissonean branches and middle hepatic vein are divided safely and the specimen is resected. OUTCOMES: Three patients underwent laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy, with no open conversions. Operative time and blood loss were 331 (concomitant with another partial hepatectomy), 277, and 315 minutes; and 200, 100, and 100 g, respectively. The postoperative courses were uneventful. LESSONS: The dorsal approach maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy and can be performed safely.

[Vascular reconstruction and transplantation technologies in liver surgery (part II)]. / Sosudistye rekonstruktsii i transplantatsionnye tekhnologii v khirurgii pecheni (chast' II).

OBJECTIVE: To systematize tactical and technical aspects of liver resections with reconstruction of afferent and efferent blood supply and/or inferior vena cava; to study postoperative outcomes in patients with focal liver lesions using transplantation technologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 413 patients with parasitic lesions, primary and secondary liver tumors involving great vessels (portal vein, hepatic artery, hepatic veins, inferior vena cava, right atrium). All ones underwent liver resections with vascular resection and reconstruction, as well as liver autotransplantation in vivo, ante situ (ex situ in vivo), extracorporeal liver resections with autotransplantation (ex vivo). RESULTS: We obtained satisfactory immediate results after liver resections using transplantation technologies. CONCLUSION: Transplantation technologies in liver surgery can significantly increase resectability of tumors and survival of patients. Transplantation technologies are an important new surgical strategy and necessary option in modern hepatic surgery.

Double hepatic vein reconstruction during extended anatomical resection of segment 8 for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic vein reconstruction (HVR) is occasionally necessary for resecting hepatic malignancies to ensure surgical margins while preserving remnant liver function [1]. Reports of multiple HVR are rare due to the highly technical demanding procedure and high risk of morbidity [2]. We introduce our procedure of double HVR for metastatic liver tumors invading the right hepatic vein (RHV) and middle hepatic vein (MHV). METHODS: The patient was a 66-year-old man with colorectal liver metastasis in segment 8, invading RHV and MHV. Due to impaired liver function, extended right hemihepatectomy was unsuitable. Thus, extended anatomical resection of segment 8 with double HVR was performed. The liver was completely mobilized and the RHV and MHV were secured. After liver parenchyma dissection, the specimen was connected by RHV and MHV (Fig. 1). The MHV was dissected and reconstructed using a right superficial femoral vein graft while the RHV remained connected [3]. Reconstruction of the MHV was performed on the posterior wall of the proximal side, followed by the anterior wall, using 4-point supporting threads. Anastomosis was performed by the over-and-over suture method. On the distal side, two-point supporting threads were applied. After specimen removal, the RHV was resected and reconstructed in the same manner using a left internal jugular vein graft [4]. RESULTS: The patient was discharged on postoperative day 14 with no signs of liver failure. Computed tomography performed six months after surgery revealed no graft occlusion (Fig. 2). CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients, this technique may be a useful option for preserving the remnant liver function.

A patient alive without disease 32 months after conversion surgery following lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor thrombus originating in the middle hepatic vein and reaching the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava: a case report.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be increasing in incidence since the advent of new molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, reports on long-term outcomes are limited and the prognostic relevance of this treatment strategy remains unclear. Herein, we report the case of a 75-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma, 108 mm in diameter, accompanied by a tumor thrombus in the middle hepatic vein that extended to the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava. He underwent conversion surgery after preceding lenvatinib treatment and is alive without disease 51 months after the commencement of treatment and 32 months after surgery. Just before conversion surgery, after 19 months of lenvatinib treatment, the main tumor had reduced in size to 72 mm in diameter, the tip of the tumor thrombus had receded back to the suprahepatic vena cava, and the tumor thrombus vascularity was markedly reduced. The operative procedure was an extended left hepatectomy with concomitant middle hepatic vein resection. The tumor thrombus was removed under total vascular exclusion via incision of the root of the middle hepatic vein. Histopathological examination revealed that more than half of the liver tumor and the tumor thrombus were necrotic.

Intrahepatic and anterior course of the inferior vena cava: CT image and 3D reconstruction of a rare anatomical variation.

The widespread use of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing and screening abdominal conditions often reveals rare, asymptomatic anomalies. There is a wide range of documented congenital variations in the anatomy of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic veins. In this report, we detail an exceptionally unusual variant of the IVC that follows a frontward and intraliver course, terminating at the anterior section of the right atrium. To gain a deeper insight into this anomaly, we employed 3D reconstruction techniques using the software Slicer and Blender.

Metallic Stents for Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation and their Therapeutic Effects.

BACKGROUND: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is established as a standard therapy for end-stage liver disease; however, vessel reconstruction is more demanding due to the short length and small size of the available structures compared with deceased-donor whole liver transplantation. Interventional radiology (IR) has become the first-line treatment for vascular complications after LDLT. Hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) is a life-threatening complication after LDLT. The aim of this study of 592 adult-to-adult LDLT cases was to investigate the safety and efficacy of stent implantation for HVOO after LDLT. METHODS: Records of patients who developed HVOO requiring any treatment were collected with special reference to the metallic stent implantation. There were 232 left-side grafts and 360 right-side grafts. Sixteen cases developed HVOO after LDLT with an incidence rate of 2.7%, 5 with a left liver graft (2%), and 11 with a right-side graft (3%). The IR was attempted for 14 cases; among those, 8 cases were treated by stent implantation. RESULTS: The technical success rate of the initial stent implantation was 100%. The pressure gradient at the stenotic site significantly improved from 12.2 (range, 10.9-20.4 cm H2O) to 3.9 cm H2O (range, 1.4-8.2 cm H2O; P = .03). The volume of the congested graft liver decreased significantly from 1448 (range, 788-2170 mL) to 1265 mL (range, 748-1665 mL; P = .01), and the serum albumin level improved significantly from 3.3 (range, 1.7-3.7 g/dL) to 3.7 g/dL (range, 2.9-4.1 g/dL; P = .02). No procedure-related complication was noted, and the long-term stent patency was 100%. CONCLUSION: Metallic stent implantation for stenotic venous anastomosis after LDLT is a safe and effective treatment.

Pediatric Hepatoblastoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Diagnostic Performance of MR in Staging POSTTEXT and Vascular Involvement.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of resectability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of hepatoblastoma is dependent on Post-Treatment EXTENT of Disease (POSTTEXT) staging and its annotation factors P (portal venous involvement) and V (hepatic venous/inferior vena cava [IVC] involvement), but MR performance in assessing them remains unclear. PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR imaging for preoperative POSTTEXT staging and diagnosing vascular involvement in terms of annotation factors P and V in pediatric hepatoblastoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients (17 males, median age, 24 months; age range, 6-98 months) with proven hepatoblastoma underwent preoperative MR imaging following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T; T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), T2WI with fat suppression, diffusion weighted imaging, radial stack-of-the-star/Cartesian 3D Dixon T1-weighted gradient echo imaging. ASSESSMENT: Three radiologists independently assessed the POSTTEXT stages and annotation factors P and V based on the 2017 PRE/POSTTEXT system. The sensitivities and specificities were calculated for 1) diagnosing each POSTTEXT stage; 2) discrimination of stages III and IV (advanced) from those stages I and II (non-advanced) hepatoblastomas; and 3) annotation factors P and V. The combination of pathologic findings and surgical records served as the reference standard. STATISTICAL TESTS: Sensitivity, specificity, Fleiss kappa test. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity ranges for discriminating advanced from non-advanced hepatoblastomas were 73.3%-80.0% and 80.0%-90.0%, respectively. For annotation factor P, they were 66.7%-100.0% and 90.6%, respectively. For factor V, they were 75.0% and 67.7%-83.9%, respectively. There was excellent, substantial, and moderate agreement on POSTTEXT staging (Fleiss kappa = 0.82), factors P (Fleiss kappa = 0.64), and factors V (Fleiss kappa = 0.60), respectively. DATA CONCLUSION: MR POSTTEXT provides reliable discrimination between advanced and non-advanced tumors, and MR has moderate to excellent specificity at identifying portal venous and hepatic venous/IVC involvement. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Novel Use of the Falciform Ligament for MHV Reconstruction During Laparoscopic Hepatectomy of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) with oncological R0 resection combined with systemic therapy offers the best chance of cure for colorectal liver metastasis. However, tumors in vicinity of major hepatic veins require complex technique. Parenchyma-sparing resection with involved vein resection and peritoneal patch reconstruction could be an efficacious alternative to preserve liver volume for adjuvant chemotherapy and avoid venous congestion of the remnant liver.1,2 METHODS: A 64-year-old female, with history of colon cancer, had new diagnosis of liver metastatic tumor of S8 (2.8 cm), which was considering encroached on middle hepatic vein (MHV) with distal part patent. Thus margin-negative, parenchyma-sparing liver resection with involved vein resection and proximal MHV reconstruction was indicated for oncological radicality. RESULTS: With the patient in modified French position, we dissected falciform ligament and right coronary ligament to expose the crypt between right hepatic vein (RHV) and MHV. Intraoperative ultrasound localized the tumor and resection margin. Parenchymal dissection was performed caudally to cranially, left to right, to ligate dorsal branch of G8 (G8d) and V8 and expose main trunk of MHV. The involved side-wall of MHV was incised after the proximal and distal parts clamped. Peritoneal patch was harvested from falciform ligament to repair MHV side-wall before clamps released. The patient had an uneventful recovery and remained disease-free at 1 year postoperatively with patency of distal MHV by image. CONCLUSIONS: LH with MHV reconstruction by falciform ligament for metastatic lesion is technically demanding but feasible with oncological radicality and volume preservation for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Pediatric living donor liver transplant for Budd-Chiari syndrome using a cryopreserved pulmonary vein graft for retro-hepatic vena cava reconstruction: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: In pediatric patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) raises substantial challenges regarding IVC reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of an 8-year-old girl with BCS caused by myeloproliferative syndrome with JAK2 V617F mutation. She had a complete thrombosis of the inferior vena cava (IVC) with multiple collaterals, developing a Budd-Chiari syndrome. She underwent LDLT with IVC reconstruction with a cryopreserved pulmonary vein graft obtained from a provincial biobank. The living donor underwent a laparoscopic-assisted left lateral hepatectomy. The reconstruction of the vena cava took place on the back table and the liver was implanted en bloc with the reconstructed IVC in the recipient. Anticoagulation was immediately restarted after the surgery because of her pro-thrombotic state. Her postoperative course was complicated by a biliary anastomotic leak and an infected biloma. The patient recovered progressively and remained well on outpatient clinic follow-up 32 weeks after the procedure. CONCLUSION: IVC reconstruction using a cryopreserved pulmonary vein graft is a valid option during LDLT for pediatric patients with BCS where reconstruction of the IVC entails considerable challenges. Early referral to a pediatric liver transplant facility with a multidisciplinary team is also important in the management of pediatric patients with BCS.

Laparoscopic Liver Tunnel for Tumors at the Hepatocaval Confluence.

BACKGROUND: Tumors at the hepatocaval confluence can be treated with parenchyma-sparing surgery, also with minimally invasive approach.1,2 The "Liver Tunnel" was described for tumors involving the paracaval portion of Sg1 in contact or infiltrating the middle hepatic vein (MHV).3 A "Liver Tunnel" with laparoscopic approach is proposed. METHODS: A 48-year-old woman was referred for three synchronous colorectal liver metastases in the paracaval portion of Sg1 in contact with the inferior vena cava and the MHV, in Sg8 ventral and in Sg6, after an urgent left laparoscopic hemicolectomy for an obstructing carcinoma. A laparoscopic Sg1 resection extended to Sg8 ventral were planned after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Estimated future liver remnant (FLR) was 75% (840 ml) of healthy liver (Fig. 1). In case of right hepatectomy extended to Sg1, estimated FLR was 25% (280 ml) of healthy liver. Fig. 1 3D reconstruction and intraoperative images of Liver Tunnel (A) and Sg6 resection (B). Total liver volume: 1110 ml. Total resected liver volume 270 ml: Liver Tunnel 93 ml; Sg6 177 ml. Liver volumes were measured with HA3D™ technology with Medics3D software (Medics3D, Turin, Italy) RESULTS: Pneumoperitoneum is established, and four operative ports are placed. Sg1 is approached from the left, dividing the Glissonean pedicles and short hepatic veins. MHV is approached cranio-caudally from the dorsal side. The resection continues on the ventral side, according to our "Ultrasound Liver Map technique" with a cranio-caudal approach to the MHV.4 Sg8 ventral pedicles are divided and the resection completed with aid of indocyanine green negative staining. A Sg6 resection is then performed. Operative time was 480 min. Blood loss was 100 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on fourth postoperative day. The two parenchyma-sparing resections saved an estimated volume of 75% (840 ml) of healthy liver (Fig. 1). The estimated remnant liver volume after a right hepatectomy extended to Sg1 would have been only 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Tumors at the hepatocaval confluence involving Sg1 can be removed with the "Liver Tunnel," which can be performed with minimally invasive approach. The "Laparoscopic Liver Tunnel" pushes further the limit of minimally invasive parenchyma-sparing surgery for ill-located tumors with complex vascular relationship.

Hilar Anatomy in 3035 Living Liver Donors: A Novel Classification for Donor Surgery and Suitability, Hepatic Surgeries, and Hepatobiliary Interventions.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the vascular and biliary variations in 3035 liver donors. We propose a novel classification of hepatic arteries, portal veins, and bile ducts and clinically relevant donor classification. METHODS: Preoperative imaging and operative details of 3035 donors from 2005 to 2020 were reviewed. Hilar anatomical variations were identified and grouped on the basis of incidence and clinical relevance. RESULTS: Hilar structures are classified according to the numbers supplying or draining the graft: for the hepatic artery, right (R) and left (L), RA1/LA1 (1 artery), RA2/LA2 (2 arteries), and RA3/LA3 (3 arteries), respectively, further defined on the basis of the inflow trunk into C (for common hepatic artery), S (for superior mesenteric artery), and L (for left gastric artery); for the portal vein, RP1 (1 vein) and RP2 (2 veins) for the right lobe; and for the hepatic duct, RB1/LB1 (1 duct), RB2/LB2 (2 ducts), RB3 (3 right ducts), and RB4 (4 right ducts). Donors were classified on the basis of anatomical variations into 3 groups: class 1 and class 2 donors, who can donate liver with acceptable risks, and class 3 donors, who are high-risk donors because they are anatomically unacceptable ( Figures S1 to S4, SDC , http://links.lww.com/TP/C918 ). CONCLUSIONS: Defining hilar anatomical variations and donor grouping into anatomy-based clinical classes helps in operative planning of donors, hepatobiliary surgeries, and interventional procedures.

Impact of the inferior vena cava morphology on fluid dynamics of the hepatic veins.

We reported previously that a large vertical interval between the hepatic segment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium (RA), referred to as the IVC-RA gap, was associated with more intraoperative bleeding during hemi-hepatectomy. We conducted a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study to clarify the impact of fluid dynamics resulting from morphologic variations around the liver. The subjects were 10 patients/donors with a large IVC-RA gap and 10 patients/donors with a small IVC-RA gap. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the IVC and hepatic vessels were created from CT images for the CFD study. Median pressure in the middle hepatic vein was significantly higher in the large-gap group than in the small-gap group (P = 0.008). Differences in hepatic vein pressure caused by morphologic variation in the IVC might be one of the mechanisms of intraoperative bleeding from the hepatic veins.

Quantitative anatomy of the large variant right hepatic vein: A systematic three-dimensional analysis.

Anatomical variations of the right hepatic vein, especially large variant right hepatic veins (≥5 mm), have important clinical implications in liver transplantation and resection. This study aimed to evaluate anatomical variations of the right hepatic vein using quantitative three-dimensional visualization analysis. Computed tomography images of 650 patients were retrospectively analyzed, and three-dimensional visualization was applied using the derived data to analyze large variant right hepatic veins. The proportion of the large variant right hepatic vein was 16.92% (110/650). According to the location and number of the variant right hepatic veins, the configuration of the right hepatic venous system was divided into seven subtypes. The length of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava had a positive correlation with the diameter of the right hepatic vein (rs = 0.266, p = 0.001) and the variant right hepatic veins (rs = 0.211, p = 0.027). The diameter of the right hepatic vein was positively correlated with that of the middle hepatic vein (rs = 0.361, p < 0.001), while it was inversely correlated with that of the variant right hepatic veins (rs = -0.267, p = 0.005). The right hepatic vein diameter was positively correlated with the drainage volume (rs = 0.489, p < 0.001), while the correlation with the variant right hepatic veins drainage volume was negative (rs = -0.460, p < 0.001). The number of the variant right hepatic veins and their relative diameters were positively correlated (p < 0.001). The volume and percentage of the drainage area of the right hepatic vein decreased significantly as the number of the variant right hepatic vein increased (p < 0.001). The findings of this study concerning the variations of the hepatic venous system may be useful for the surgical planning of liver resection or transplantation.

Laparoscopic anatomical resection of segment II: left lateral section-flip up method to safely and effectively encircle the Glissonean branch and expose the left hepatic vein (with video).

Laparoscopic anatomical resection of liver segment II (S2 segmentectomy) using left lateral section-flip up method is introduced to safely and effectively encircle the Glissonean branch of segment II (G2) and to expose the left hepatic vein (LHV). The left lateral section is completely mobilized and then flipped up. After encircling and clamping the G2 root, indocyanine green is intravenously injected and the demarcation line is clearly confirmed by near infrared fluorescence imaging. After exposure of the LHV from the root to this intersegmental plane between segments II/III, residual parenchymal resection is performed using the clamp crushing method. There are two difficulties concerning S2 segmentectomy. The first is encirclement of the G2 root without interfering with the G3. Compared with the conventional front view of the umbilical portion, the view behind the left lateral section contribute to easy confirmation and direct encircle of the G2 root without dividing the G3 and injuring LHV on the same plane. The second difficulty is that the boundary of the visible liver surface between segments II/III does not match the direction of the LHV. This can cause confusion to the operator aiming to perform precise inner parenchymal resection. Our procedure allows easy access to the LHV root and exposure of the peripheral directing hepatic vein. Hepatic vein-guided approaches will likely be helpful in precise performance of inner parts of liver resection.

Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome versus sinusoidal obstruction syndrome: a review.

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) are two major vascular disorders of the liver, of which both can cause portal hypertension related complications, but their locations of obstruction are different. BCS refers to the obstruction from the hepatic vein to the junction between the inferior vena cava and right atrium, which is the major etiology of post-sinusoidal portal hypertension; by comparison, SOS is characterized as the obstruction at the level of hepatic sinusoids and terminal venulae, which is a cause of sinusoidal portal hypertension. Both of them can cause hepatic congestion with life-threatening complications, especially acute liver failure and chronic portal hypertension, and share some similar features in terms of imaging and clinical presentations, but they have heterogeneous risk factors, management strategy, and prognosis. Herein, this paper reviews the current evidence and then summarizes the difference between primary BCS and SOS in terms of risk factors, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment.

Pure Laparoscopic Anatomic Resection of Liver Segment 4 with Middle Hepatic Vein Involvement Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Staining.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic anatomic resection of liver segment 4 is a technically challenging operation, which is rarely reported owing to the difficulty of defining the demarcation of a hepatic segment 4 on a monitor.1 The portal territory staining method is technically feasible to identify tumors and segment boundaries during hepatectomy.2 Herein, we describe the laparoscopic hepatectomy of segment 4 using the fluorescent-positive staining method. METHODS: A 72-year-old man recurred colorectal liver metastases after colectomy, positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) showed metastases located in segment 4 with involvement of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and caudate lobe; no other organ metastasis or recurrence occurred. We performed an anatomical hepatectomy 4 with MHV and parenchymal resection of segment 1 (H1'/4-MHV).3 The key point of the procedure was dividing and clamping Glisson's branches for segment 2 and segment 3 using the hepatic round ligament approach; the G2 and G3 were dissected along the right side of round ligament via the extrahepatic Glissonian approach, then the left hepatic artery (LHA) was divided and injected with ICG in the left portal vein (LPV). Finally, transection was performed along the fluorescent stain location line and ischemic demarcation line. RESULTS: The operation time was 263 min; the Pringle lasted 110 min, and the estimated blood loss was 400 g. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without complications. Sigmoid carcinoma and R0 margin were confirmed by histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy 4 with middle hepatic vein invasion using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence staining is a feasible and effective technique.